Archive for January, 2007
WVU Philosophy
January 24, 2007 4:11 pm by Mister DAlright, WVU fans. Time to give you something to talk about on this here blog.
West Virginia is one of the most unique teams in the country, let alone the Big East. Up until last year, they were characterized by a cast of misfits…a freakish 7-1 center who drained 24-footers with regularity, a feisty German swingman, a skinny white kid who could always play smart, unselfish, high-quality basketball. This year, with the exception of senior forward Frank Young, they’ve become a cast of no-name freshmen and sophomores.
One thing, however, remains the same: Coach Beilein’s game philosophy.
If he were to write a description of his philosophy in forty words or fewer, it might read something like this: “Play aggressive, zone (1-3-1), trapping defense to force transition hoops. On offense, motion around the perimeter, and if at any point you catch a slightly obscured, fleeting glimpse of the rim, jack up a three!”
I have two questions about this philosophy. 1) Can WVU really expect to win a championship this way? 2) Who would even want to play in this system?
Certainly, they’ve had success in the past few years. I’d be both remiss and incorrect if I didn’t admit this. Big East tourney runner-up and regional finalist two years ago; Big East Tourney semi-finalist last year and a sweet 16 berth. Yet, while competitive, they never really seem to get over the hump. They haven’t won that big, big game to earn them a conference championship or get them to a Final Four. I know, I know…you could say this about tons of teams in college basketball. But considering no team has ever won a championship using the type of system that Beilein uses, I think it’s more than fair to question his philosophy.
Let’s start with the offense.
Offensive Philosophy: The old saying goes that if you live by the three, you die by the three. And then there’s West Virginia, who jacks up more threes than any other team in the Big East. They’ve attempted 531 three-pointers this year—the most in the Big East by 67 attempts (Notre Dame is in second place, having played two more games than WVU). These numbers are consistently absurd, and absurdly consistent.
This particular style of play has been established for several years now under the tutelage of Beilein. They’ve jacked up more threes than any other Big East team for each of the last few years. But why play in this manner, when most other college basketball programs, and most of the greatest college basketball coaches in the world, have their teams shoot so many fewer three-balls per game? Wouldn’t someone have said, “Uh, coach? Why are we taking such low percentage shots every time down the floor? Shouldn’t we get closer to the rim, and then use the three to spread the defense? You know, keep them off-balance?”
Indeed, West Virginia plays Keno, while the rest of the country plays blackjack.
But is there method to this madness? Maybe. Perhaps Beilein recruits players to fit this mold—guys who can drain 22-footers all night. Perhaps Beilein feels that this type of offensive play forces the opposing teams into a competitive mental state where they attempt to match threes for threes, thus bringing opponents out of their gameplan. Who knows. All I know is, they haven’t won that big game.
Now, to the defense.
Defensive Philosophy: I’m sorry, but the 1-3-1 is gimmicky. It screams: “We can’t man up! Try to beat us using diagonal passes!” Certainly it can be effective because teams aren’t used to seeing it on a regular basis. It’s difficult to prepare for a half-court trapping zone defense in just a few days’ time, and WVU uses this to its advantage. Still, more often than not, a balanced, disciplined team is going to exploit their defense. Which is part of the reason why they’ve never won that big game.
Now, on to the second question: who would ever want to play in a system like this? Well, just ask all of the NBA players who hail from WVU.
Oh, wait. There aren’t any active WVU alums in the NBA.
In fact, WVU is the only Big East team that currently doesn’t have an alumnus playing in the NBA. Even South Florida has NBA representation, for crying out loud!
And here’s a question for you Howie Schwab types: Who was the last player from WVU to play in an NBA game?
Give up?
Lowes Moore, class of 1982.
Yes…”Damn!” is what I said too.
Why no representation in the NBA? I say part of it is due to Beilein’s system.
First of all, WVU is considered a soft team. They play a gimmicky defense, which you never ever see in the NBA. Furthermore, their perimeter trapping defense, combined with their perimeter offense, usually means that they’re being out-rebounded in every single contest because they’re so far away from the rim during any given play (last in the Big East this year in total rebounding). Frontcourt players are forced outside, severely limiting their rebounding potential. And NBA scouts notice. Kevin Pittsnogle, for example, was 7-1, agile, and one of the worst rebounders on last year’s team. Think about it: if an NBA team is going to draft somebody who’s 7-1, they’re going to want him to box out Yao, grab boards, and play in the post, not sit outside the arc and throw up bombs. Part of the reason he’s not in an NBA uniform is probably his fault, but surely part of it is the system in which he played.
The same can be said about the backcourt players. They show a decent amount of athleticism, but much of what they do is pass the ball and jack up threes. If you want to be able to play in the pros, you better be able to show the pros that you can do more than shoot and pass, you better be able to take someone off the dribble…which WVU doesn’t stress in their offense (last in the Big East this year in total free throw attempts).
Look. Don’t get me wrong. I love the way WVU plays. On both ends of the floor, they play differently than 99% of the teams in Division I college basketball, which is really cool to watch. Moreover, the players themselves look as though they’re having fun playing this way. However, just because their style of play is pleasing to the average spectator doesn’t mean that their style of play is the best way to build a championship program or produce professional-caliber players. In fact, the evidence clearly points to the contrary.
Unless you can convince us otherwise, Coach B.
Categories: Commentary, Mister D, West Virginia
4 Comments »
ND has gone too far!!
January 23, 2007 10:39 am by Coach OThe dismissal of PG Kyle McAlarney from the University of Notre Dame is a major injustice to both the student and the men’s basketball program.
Now, I don’t condone drug use nor do I feel that McAlarney should not be punished for having marijuana in his car during a routine stop. As an educator and former coach I do feel that student athletes should be held to the same standards as all other students. And as a coach, I would have done exactly what Coach Brey did in suspending McAlarney immediately and possibly for the remainder of the season. I commend Coach Brey for his quick and definitive action.
Where I have a problem is the fact that this occurred off campus at the corner of Grape and Douglas. About 5 miles from the campus. He was put on one year probation and made to do community service and attend classes. That is fine. After one year his record will be clean. He has no history. If he had been caught by ND police on campus with drugs I agree that the school has every right to expel him. What he was charged with by Indiana State Police is a misdemeanor. What would have happened if he was stopped in his hometown in Long Island? Would he have been expelled? What if it was a student who was not an athlete? From the article in the South Bend Tribune he may reapply for next year. I wouldn’t blame him for going elsewhere.
This smacks of the expulsion of Julius Jones for being in a dorm room of a female after 9PM a few years ago. Jones did reapply after a year out of school and the rest is history. But that was an on-campus incident. This was not.
I just feel that this was not a university issue. It was handled very well by both the authorities and Coach Brey. Suspending him for the season would have been fine. Expelling him is an injustice that will affect recruiting in what is already a very tough area for Brey what with admission standards being what they are. Will a top recruit choose another program where, if they make a mistake will be dealt with in a much fairer and less embarrassing way?
Only time will tell,
Categories: Coach O, Commentary, Notre Dame
4 Comments »
BE Tournament Update
January 22, 2007 3:16 pm by Big Willie Style
With the tournament coming in about a month in a half, here’s what the tournament would look like if conference play ended today. Of course, there’s still a long way to go, but why not speculate?
Pitt, Marquette and Notre Dame have in my mind been the best three teams so far this season. Syracuse is slotted as the #3 seed, but a weak early schedule has helped them a lot. The middle part of the conference is a mess, and the one surprise for me so far is that St. John’s is falling off the pace. They’ve been so hit or miss this year and they’re really hard to figure.
What to look for in the next couple of weeks:
Syracuse will lose multiple games. They have Louisville, ND, DePaul and UConn in succession, and I expect them to drop out of the top 4.
Pitt will get back on track. This week they play Cincinnati and St. John’s, and then they’ll be in full control of the conference at 7-1.
In two weeks, Marquette will have separated themselves from the third place team, and it’ll be them and Pitt at the top. Their next four games are SHU, USF, Providence, Rutgers. I can’t see them losing more than one, if any of those games.
Categories: Big Willie Style, Postseason
1 Comment »
Winning on the Road
1:15 pm by Coach OThe team that comes out on top of the Big East standings will be the team that can post a few meaningful road victories.
Marquette had a huge road win this weekend over Pitt. Notre Dame has yet to win a road game, and UConn is 1-2. This doesn’t bode well for those two squads. DePaul is already 2-1 on the road and fighting to get to the middle of the pack. Pitt is 2-0 on the opponent’s home court, Marquette is 3-1 away, Syracuse is 2-1, Louisville is 2-0, and Georgetown is 2-1.
Other teams like UConn and ND that must step up away from home are West Virginia and Villanova. Holding court at home and stealing a few on the road is the key to a good seed at MSG come March. With UConn visiting Louisville tonight (1/22) and ND at St. John’s Tuesday the picture should begin to clear up.
Categories: Coach O, Commentary
2 Comments »
Pittsburgh 63, Connecticut 54
January 17, 2007 12:02 am by donald- 12 and a half minutes. That’s how long it took UCONN to make a jump shot tonight. From three, UCONN shot 2-13. Heck, they shot worse from the free throw line (10-23 for 43.5%) than Pittsburgh shot from the field (20-45 for 44.4%). You have to make those free throws. The days of Rashard Anderson, Ben Gordon, and Richard Hamilton are gone.
- And yet, the game was close. Connecticut was within seven with a few minutes left, even though Pittsburgh played a near-perfect game. Everything went right for Pitt: Gray got great position all day long, and Ramon went 4-4 from three. And that’s when it hit me. I’ve been wondering what’s wrong with Pittsburgh all year long, and I finally was able to put my finger on it: in the words of Clark Kellogg, they have no spurtability. The Panthers play an extremely rigid half court game where each player touches the ball. It looks beautiful to a control freak, and it is gorgeous to see them get the ball to Aaron Gray at exactly the right moment in exactly the right position. But I think they ignore the flow of the game and sometimes force this structure on the game. Case in point: Ramon. It was pretty evident that he was feeling it tonight. And yet there was no effort to get him the ball — no plays set to run him off of screens, no high picks when he had the ball up top, etc. My prediction: later this season Pittsburgh will fail to close an opponent out due to their adherence to their half-court set.
- Dick Vitale spoke some wisdom tonight: “Dwyane Wade is, without question, arguably one of the best players in the NBA.”
Categories: Commentary, Connecticut, donald, Pittsburgh
3 Comments »


















