Big East Hoops

Marquette: first impressions

December 14, 2006 12:33 am by donald

This will be the first in a series of posts on my first impressions of Big East teams. I saw Marquette play Wisconsin on Saturday, and here’s my thesis:

Marquette is a poor man’s 2005-2006 Villanova.

  • Dominic James, Jerel McNeal, and Wesley Matthews remind me a lot of Kyle Lowry, Allan Ray, and Randy Foye (not necessarily in that order). Both triumverates are/were very quick and a bit undersized. They possess similar games: they either take you off the dribble straight to the hoop, or pull up for some ridiculous three that goes in more often than you think it ought to. Dominic James even wears the same type of elbow guard that Allan Ray did last year. Sometimes I think the Marquette guards get away with traveling when they execute a crossover dribble; I had the same qualm about Villanova last year.
  • Their supporting casts are also very similar: Ousmane Barro and Dan Fitzgerald lack strong post moves but make up for it with a lot of grit, just like Dante Cunningham and Will Sheridan.
  • Defense: Very tenacious — up in people’s faces, aggressively double-teaming, and waving arms and hands frenetically. Just like Villanova last year, they need this feverish pitch to overcome the size disadvantage. This was effective against some of Wisconsin’s players, who lost their composure and traveled or committed offensive fouls by using their elbows to get more personal space. At times, though, the defense seems out of control. In the first half against Wisconsin, the aggressive double-teaming hurt quite a bit, as Wisconsin held their composure and delivered quick, accurate passes to cutting players. The Marquette defense needs to work a bit more on rotating over after the double team.
  • Offense: Few set plays, a lot of penetration off of high screens and kicking the ball out for a three, and just letting Dominic James do his thing. It’s not the most aesthetically-pleasing flavor of basketball (I’m a Pete Carril man), but it works well with this lineup. Dominic James is a major talent and reminds me of Allen Iverson. But I think Tom Crean lets his players stand and watch James too often. On Saturday, they only had 8 assists on 26 baskets (as opposed to Wisconsin’s 17 on 29).

It’s hard for me to get a read of Marquette, but I think they’re in for a rocky year. They could beat or lose to anybody in the country on a given night. They sure are exciting, though, and I look forward to some crazy games this year.

Oh, and one last thing: Ousmane Barro is going to break somebody’s face this year. Dude has some nasty elbows.

7 Responses to “Marquette: first impressions”

Big Willie Style wrote a comment on December 14, 2006

I agree exactly. They’re not nearly as good as Nova was last year, but if those Sophs stick around a while, they will be eventually.

NY Warrior wrote a comment on December 14, 2006

I would not expect MU’s sophomores be as good as Nova’s seniors were last year. However, as freshmen the MU trio performed better than their Nova counterparts.

The team may have a few hiccups this year but they’re still a young bunch (only Lott and Kinsella are seniors). I still contend that the biggest issues for MU are shot distribution (Fitz and Cubillan need more) and pace of play (this team needs to score closer to 80 to play to its strengths).

We’ll see what kind of adjustments Crean makes leading into the PC game on 1/4.

Dan'l B wrote a comment on December 14, 2006

Good points on all counts. MU’s stats agree on many counts. They steal a ton of balls and block a lot of shots, particularly when you account for the undersized rotation, but the high 3pt FG% allowed suggests that either their aggressiveness allows for too many open jumpers or they’ve gotten unlucky.

B.Cerny wrote a comment on December 14, 2006

Great assessment. Once MU gets more consistent & comfortable shooting the ball & making free throws…they are going to be one of the most feared teams in the country, not like they’re shabby now though. I haven’t missed a home game in 10 years, and this is one of the most entertaining/exciting teams I’ve witnessed…and they’re only going to get better.

I don’t think it’s going to be a rocky year. They’re going to win some big games, and lose some close ones too. I’m predicting they will remain in the top 25 for the entire season.

[…] Eric Devendorf is a poor man’s Manu Ginobli. Yes, I love analogies (previous ones I’ve brought up here include Jeff Green being a poor man’s Chris Webber, Marquette’s triumvirate as a poor man’s 2005-2006 Villanova three-guard lineup, and Dominic James as a poor man’s Allen Iverson). Or I just love poor men. Regardless, Devendorf and Ginobli are both crafty in their head and shoulder jerks and are unafraid to venture down the lane. […]

nbqthdozwy wrote a comment on July 2, 2007

Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! cusadhzfkt

[…] Last year I said they were a poor man’s Villanova. They’re not a poor man’s anybody this year. […]

Care to comment?