<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle Tested or Demoralized?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigeasthoops.com/2006/11/17/battle-tested-or-demoralized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigeasthoops.com/2006/11/17/battle-tested-or-demoralized/</link>
	<description>Bloggin' Big East basketball since way back (2006).</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan'l B</title>
		<link>http://www.bigeasthoops.com/2006/11/17/battle-tested-or-demoralized/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan'l B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigeasthoops.com/2006/11/17/battle-tested-or-demoralized/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>In case you missed it, Jackson State won their first game this season at the RAC on the 21st. Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, Jackson State won their first game this season at the RAC on the 21st. Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Willie Style</title>
		<link>http://www.bigeasthoops.com/2006/11/17/battle-tested-or-demoralized/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Willie Style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigeasthoops.com/2006/11/17/battle-tested-or-demoralized/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>It'll be interesting to see exactly how "we" stack up this year.  We're strong at the top with Pitt, who can play with anyone.  However, their wins aren't going to look as impressive as UF or UNC because of their style.  But they're right there with them.

After that, we have a mess of teams such as Syracuse, Georgetown, Marquette, UConn, Villanova, Louisville and I was hoping maybe DePaul (maybe not) that could all fall between 15-30 in the nation.  At the bottom, we're weak, no doubt.

The Big East doesn't appear to be as strong, but who knows, it's still real early.  I still think we're an 8-bid legaue with a National Championship contender.  That sounds good, but the bottom may kill our RPI this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see exactly how &#8220;we&#8221; stack up this year.  We&#8217;re strong at the top with Pitt, who can play with anyone.  However, their wins aren&#8217;t going to look as impressive as UF or UNC because of their style.  But they&#8217;re right there with them.</p>
<p>After that, we have a mess of teams such as Syracuse, Georgetown, Marquette, UConn, Villanova, Louisville and I was hoping maybe DePaul (maybe not) that could all fall between 15-30 in the nation.  At the bottom, we&#8217;re weak, no doubt.</p>
<p>The Big East doesn&#8217;t appear to be as strong, but who knows, it&#8217;s still real early.  I still think we&#8217;re an 8-bid legaue with a National Championship contender.  That sounds good, but the bottom may kill our RPI this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
